onsdag den 25. september 2013

Steen's Chronicle: Pause in asset inflation?

We have taken profit on what we consider the 'tapering re-pricing' which happened last week after the Federal Open Market Committee decided not to start reducing its asset purchases. Now we are looking for a small correction which we will manage by shorting the DAX and the NASDAQ.

Preferred path
Our preferred path from here looks like the chart of the NQ-100 below which we ultimately want to go short big time when this cycle ends in late 2013 or early 2014:

 

Source: Bloomberg

Apprehensive re. next month
We are apprehensive about the coming month due to several factors:

·         The expected fourth wave correction down

·         The seasonal weakness in September/October (see below)

·         Fund managers and pundits who constantly say that Europe is cheap?

The latter is personally what scares me the most - cheap relative to what?

Yesterday, a UK-based manager even tried to convince himself (certainly not me) that Europe has the lowest foreign trade/exposure of any major trading bloc. Where do these people get their information from? Starbucks, perhaps?

Source: seasonalcharts.com

More QE, less growth, less inflation and less upside
Finally, I have mentioned a few times how I see the fourth quarter having a dramatic slow-down effect, mainly due to unemployment rising, but also due to a serious drop in US housing activities. Please see the chart below. It clearly shows not only why housing will fall (correlation with a lag of mortgage rates) but also why we will see more quantitative easing (QE) rather than less.

Tapering will not happen in October or in 2013 for that matter. Not a single economic vector in our model is pointing up. All indicate less growth, less inflation and less upside. The problem? The market is still talking recovery, despite the US this year being barely able to muster 1.5 percent growth after 2.5 percent last year. If this is recovery, I don't want to experience recession.

Source: Thomson Reuters

Non-tapering changed fixed income's relative value over equities
Again, we are increasingly confident about our 2.25 percent 10-year US bond rate call by the end of Q4-2013 versus 2.65 percent now. The Federal Open Market Committee's fixed income put issued by the Fed's recent non-tapering act has changed the relative value of fixed income over equities. This story has only just begun.

Market focus
I remain 80 percent long fixed income in my Beta portfolio (Bunds, US 10-year (IEF ETF) and Danish 1.5 percent 10-year government bonds).

Alpha-wise, increasingly my Gold calls still see 1525/75 before falling again, and finally I continue to play the US dollar short as the path of least resistance will be a lower US dollar to help refuel emerging market currencies.

I am off to Slovakia.

Stay safe,

Steen

 

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Economist

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

Prepared for collapsing house sales in Q4

The lead/lag of mortgage into house sales is stunning….below our Q4 outlook

 

This work is done in co-operation with my macro partner……

 

Conclusion:  Be long fixed income over equity from now through end of 2014….. I remain 80% long in my beta portfolio…. 2.25% target for Q4 – and retest of old low in yield in 2014. Market is not ready for the dramatic slow-down coming…

 

 

 

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Economist

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

mandag den 23. september 2013

Steen's Chronicle: Merkel may be the Queen of Germany, but she's missing a Prince...

Merkel may be the Queen of Germany, but she's missing a Prince...

 

http://www.tradingfloor.com/posts/merkel-queen-germany-shes-missing-prince-1093286340

The German election was great for Angela Merkel personally, bad for Germany, and bad for reform in Europe and Germany. While there has been no impact on markets in the short-term, the noise and hence the volatility will increase as no one is willing to join Merkel government.

Standing alone: Who will stand with Merkel?                        Source: Handelsblatt


Germany is slowing down
Germany is already deaccelerating growth and social tensions are on the rise with the working poor numbering seven million. Add in the emerging market slowdown and you have a cocktail that will start to hurt German exports by the fourth quarter. Being in government is the last place you might want to be as 2014 will see Germany move towards zero growth and in dire need of reforms again. The SPD should stay out of government and it most probably will.

Buit if SPD joins the government in a coalition, the price will be less reforms, not more. EU politics will become less about austerity and more of a Club Med. 

So Merkel is a Queen without a prince and with the DAX and the EURUSD unchanged, the market reaction this morning also reflects this. 

Source: Bloomberg

Horse-trading
With Merkel's victory but subsequent failure to secure a majority, the horse-trading is about to get underway and could in many ways act as a reminder for the talks that dominated the German Federal Election 2005.

Some victories can be costly. Merkel's victory is very much perennial kingmaker FDP's loss. With it banished from the political landscape that the party had occupied since WWII, Merkel is left searching for a coalition partners.

The problem she has here is that the two potential partners - The Green Party and SPD - are both sceptical. SPD is still suffering from having worked with Merkel after former chancellor Gerhard Schröder's political misjudgement in calling an early election in 2005. If it is serious about returning to power in Germany, the party's best strategy would be to form a powerful opposition to Merkel and position its strong grassroots and länder stronghold for the right candidate in 2017.

Presently it seems Hamburg Mayor Olaf Scholz is a name to follow.....

The German newspapers this morning are full of exactly this story: the victory without majority.

"We have experience with the grand coalition, and it's not particularly positive," says North Rhine-Westphalia state premier Hannelore Kraft. "This is an issue that is very difficult in our party."

"The ball is now with Merkel," said SPD General Secretary Andrea Nahles. 

Killing
The SPD's problem in opposition has been that Merkel is more than willing to take its side on SPD causes with the result that she is "killing them" by going left all the time. That highly effective strategy leaves the SPD with no choice in my opinion. Stay strong or disappear.

The party needs to rebuild its confidence and this is better served in opposition than in government. If in doubt, look to the FDP. The FDP is as much part of the "success" of Germany as Merkel, but it is Merkel who has taken all the glory.

But if SPD joins the government, it will insist on strong concessions. The SPD campaigned on social justice issues and help for the working poor, so it would expect a softening of some of its own tough labour reforms from a decade ago and demand a national minimum wage. (Source: Telegraph.co.uk)

On the critical Euro bond issue, SPD tried its hand at openly supporting "more Europe", but its voters reacted so now they are pro with the caveat that its leaders are always stressing that it would mean changing the German Constitution. This link is excellent reading on the SPD's dilemma.

Austerity
The bigger fundamental change should SPD join would be on austerity: Zeit writes: 

"Traditionally, the Socialists are more internationalist-minded than the Union. They would participate in the government but the Merkelsche Austeritätkurs would be terminated."

Whatever government is formed, the underlying economic trend is clear. Germany's victory in the fight against the debt crsis and its self-perception peaked yesterday. From here on in, it's back to work. Merkel will find that the domestic agenda over the next few years will be just as critical as the EU. 

The working poor, the minimum wage, a divided Germany (East vs. West), her party without an heir to her throne, and a Europe where no reforms are still the main driver. And you can add to this that Germany is becoming a hugely expensive place in which to produce due to its energy policy.

The government predicts that the renewable energy surcharge added to every consumer's electricity bill will increase from 5.3 cents today to between 6.2 and 6.5 cents per kilowatt hour. That policy will add 20 percent to the cost of energy this year alone!

German consumers already pay the highest electricity prices in Europe. But because the government is failing to get the costs of its new energy policy under control, rising prices are already on the horizon. Electricity is becoming a luxury good in Germany, and one of the country's most important future-oriented projects is acutely at risk.

Again, when there is an action there is a reaction. Controlling the action is the easy part, the consequences of the reaction is the harder part, as Merkel and German consumers will realise in 2014.

 

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Economist

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

fredag den 20. september 2013

Old ladies vs. drivers & Fed vs. Markets...

Some Friday anology for you…..

YOU HAVE TO LISTEN/SEE this... Incredible...(Hat-tip: Ian Green)

A Fed analogy: The Four Old ladies is the market & the driver is the FED......

Friday finally: So if you are confused and tired and can't believe your own ears and eyes, Let me cheer you up.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TN8YQVM1GQI

Advices:

#1: Don't run red lights
#2: Don't underestimate old ladies

:-) Nice weekend...

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Economist

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

Macro Digest: Ms. Janet Yellen - The next Fed Chairman a closer look

Dear All,

 

Attached is a deeper portrait of Ms. Janet Yellen – I wish I could take the honor of having written it but… it's my intern Marcus Henglein, Oxford University, who wrote it. I found many new and useful angles on what to expect from Yellen. She is very dovish, Keynesian, but also intellectual honest.

 

She will be a steady pair of hands having work at the Fed since the 1970s but she is likely to be supporting a model, Fed, which is increasingly losing its way, reduced to "talking to the market".

 

Driving to work this morning I had to laugh:  Why is it Fed thinks they can "forward guide" the market? Since when have talk been worth anything?  No, Fed, ECB, and BOE soon will realize it's what you do that matters not what you say and that may prove to be the real problem.

 

Nice week-end

 

Steen

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Economist

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

onsdag den 18. september 2013

Macro Digest: The morning after......Post match analysis on FOMC vs. The Market

Dear All

 

Below the full FOMC text – In my opinion these two paragraphs are the key ones:

 

·         .... The Committee sees the downside risks to the outlook for the economy and the labor market as having diminished, on net, since last fall, but the tightening of financial conditions observed in recent months, if sustained, could slow the pace of improvement in the economy and labor market.

 

·         The Committee recognizes that inflation persistently below its 2 percent objective could pose risks to economic performance, but it anticipates that inflation will move back toward its objective over the medium term.

 

#1 – Tighter monetary conditions clearly concerns them – the only reason for forward guidance as per Vice-chairman Yellen is to "direct market" to FOMC central projection – this got out of control and we now effectively have not only a put on the stock market, but also a put on the bond market. The whole financial market is now "government controlled" – Price discovery has been reduced close to ZERO – as even the term-premium (expected rate expectations) is ignored and considered invalid by Fed and its merry men.

 

# 2 – The wording is mild, but it's a real concern. I have no doubt inflation, or lack of, played bigger role than anything else in taking decision to not taper. An economy with weak inflation, is an economy with excess capacity – An economy with excess capacity is not an economy healing and creating jobs – hence – Fed also de facto yesterday stated: the unemployment rate is invalid to use as gauge for future monetary policy but also as statistical indicator. (Free advice to Fed: Watch hours worked and Hour wages – as those two multiplied is what goes into GDP……just saying J) – Don't forget also that FOMC exact wording is: "Substantial improvement…." – when talking about tapering and changes to monetary policy….

 

 

We have been sceptical on tapering and the notion monetary policy had moved towards "normalization" – below my recent comments to this, incl. the higher probability direction post-FOMC:

 

S&P – we have looked for around 1770/1800 – there is some tech. resistance around 1725/30…but market will "have a party next 48 hours" taking market to extreme overbought..

Gold – We see 1525 by Q4….peak in this cycle.

10 Y US – 2,25% by Q4 – and serious potential for new lows in 2014….(Q4)

US Dollar Index – We target 78-79,00 and see weak US dollar into end December based on "non-tapering" but just as important we need for weaker US Dollar in EMG makes it path of least resistance…..

 

In general we see peak in hope, assets, dreams, illusion between now and Q1-2014 – 2014 looks ugly in our forward looking models (see notes)

 

Supporting Link:  

 

Enjoy it while it lasts- next is pain an a mandate for change   (Our first look into 2014 and 2015 w. supporting charts on fixed income, US Dollar and the economy)

 

Jakobsen: More QE expected over next two years (Short video explaining why we saw more QE not less before FOMC/Tapering meeting)

 

Jakobsen: Why I'm moving 80% of my portfolio to bonds (Video on why we took step to increase our Beta allocation to 80% fixed income when we hit 3% in 10 Yr. US bonds.

 

 

Statement Following September Meeting --

2013-09-18 18:04:51.76 GMT

 

 

The following is the full text of the statement following the Fed's September

meeting:

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in July suggests that economic activity has been expanding at a moderate pace. Some indicators of labor market conditions have shown further improvement in recent months, but the unemployment rate remains elevated. Household spending and business fixed investment advanced, and the housing sector has been strengthening, but mortgage rates have risen further and fiscal policy is restraining economic growth. Apart from fluctuations due to changes in energy prices, inflation has been running below the Committee's longer-run objective, but longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability.

 

The Committee expects that, with appropriate policy accommodation, economic growth will pick up from its recent pace and the unemployment rate will gradually decline toward levels the Committee judges consistent with its dual mandate. The Committee sees the downside risks to the outlook for the economy and the labor market as having diminished, on net, since last fall, but the tightening of financial conditions observed in recent months, if sustained, could slow the pace of improvement in the economy and labor market.

 

The Committee recognizes that inflation persistently below its 2 percent objective could pose risks to economic performance, but it anticipates that inflation will move back toward its objective over the medium term.

 

Taking into account the extent of federal fiscal retrenchment, the Committee sees the improvement in economic activity and labor market conditions since it began its asset purchase program a year ago as consistent with growing underlying strength in the broader economy. However, the Committee decided to await more evidence that progress will be sustained before adjusting the pace of its purchases.

 

Accordingly, the Committee decided to continue purchasing additional agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of $40 billion per month and longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of $45 billion per month. The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction.

 

Taken together, these actions should maintain downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, support mortgage markets, and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative, which in turn should promote a stronger economic recovery and help to ensure that inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with the Committee's dual mandate.

The Committee will closely monitor incoming information on economic and financial developments in coming months and will continue its purchases of Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities, and employ its other policy tools as appropriate, until the outlook for the labor market has improved substantially in a context of price stability. In judging when to moderate the pace of asset purchases, the Committee will, at its coming meetings, assess whether incoming information continues to support the Committee's expectation of ongoing improvement in labor market conditions and inflation moving back toward its longer-run objective. Asset purchases are not on a preset course, and the Committee's decisions about their pace will remain contingent on the Committee's economic outlook as well as its assessment of the likely efficacy and costs of such purchases.

To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee today reaffirmed its view that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the asset purchase program ends and the economic recovery strengthens. In particular, the Committee decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to

1/4 percent and currently anticipates that this exceptionally low range for the federal funds rate will be appropriate at least as long as the unemployment rate remains above 6-1/2 percent, inflation between one and two years ahead is projected to be no more than a half percentage point above the Committee's 2 percent longer-run goal, and longer-term inflation expectations continue to be well anchored. In determining how long to maintain a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy, the Committee will also consider other information, including additional measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial developments. When the Committee decides to begin to remove policy accommodation, it will take a balanced approach consistent with its longer-run goals of maximum employment and inflation of 2 percent.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; James Bullard; Charles L. Evans; Jerome H.

Powell; Eric S. Rosengren; Jeremy C. Stein; Daniel K. Tarullo; and Janet L.

Yellen. Voting against the action was Esther L. George, who was concerned that the continued high level of monetary accommodation increased the risks of future economic and financial imbalances and, over time, could cause an increase in long-term inflation expectations.

 

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Economist

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

Steen's Chronicle: Enjoy it while it last..........

 

 

Dear All,

 

This weeks Stress Indicators attached, and below a summary of my outlook plus expected path from here.

 

Steen

 

 

·         Monetary Policy: We expect the policy makers central banks to engage in more QE not less, hence we see repricing of risk HIGHER into end of September, early October, but then economic slow-down will start to materialize. (See below)

 

·         FOMC/Fed in September (17/18th).  Tapering will probably happen in September but its size and time frame will be limited. Consensus right now: 10 bln. USD of reduction in "support" – Probably 5 bln. in Treasury and 5 bln. in Mortgage backed. The "new information" will be the 2016 Fed projection which is released. I expect Fed staff to lower significantly the immediate growth and keep the long-term projections (otherwise the debt to gdp explode!)

 

·         Economics: We see zero bound growth in Germany and US next year based on fiscal constraints, worse employment situation, falling disposable income(higher rates, energy prices, lower house prices), significantly lower EMG growth, and geopolitical risk and non-reforms. Furthermore the EMG crisis is a function of much lower current account surplus' which for Asia and BRICs have fallen from surplus' of 5-7% prior to crisis to now zero. This raises marginal cost of capital but also lower export markets for countries like Germany.

 

·         Strategy wise- Beta – The conservative part of the investment)  I have moved 80% to fixed income despite consensus of higher rates in market. This is NOT a short-term call but 3% in US Dollar over next 12 month could offer higher potential return than being fully invested into a market place which at best is fairly priced, at worst is in a bubble which the central banks is finally starting to acknowledge.

 

·         Fixed Income call:  Now/soon may be the most opportune time to purchase longer duration fixed-income securities in the past two years. Bond yields began to move higher in early May when signs of growth firmed up, the Fed turned hawkish, but long yields rose sharply after Ben Bernanke's maladroit comments regarding the possibility of tapering. The change in the 10-yr bond (on a daily close basis) was from 1.6255 on May 2 to 2.9937 on September 5 -- an almost 85 percent rise (basis-wise) in four months. This was the largest CYCLICAL increase in the last 50 years. Although some factors exacerbated the rise in yields (e.g., the preference of President Obama for Larry Summers as replacement for Bernanke), the fact remains that this large increase in rates was NOT justified by any measure insofar as paltry improvement in CYCLICAL (growth) factors are concerned. History also shows that after bond yields peaked, the subsequent fall in rates ranges from 27 to 45 percent cent (the median being 36 percent). If indeed we have seen the peak at circa 3.00%, then a 36 percent fall will bring yields to the area of 2.25% on the basis of CYCLICAL factors alone.But if we add to that the collective evidence of a likely slowdown in 2014, there is no reaon why we can't see yields again in the range of 1.5%-1-25% by late 2014.

 

 

·         Strategy Alpha:

 

1.      We expect lower US Dollar based on need for EMG countries through their link to have some easing of conditions – The US Dollar index (80% EURUSD) could fall to 78-79,00 from 82.00 now. 

2.      Long Gold. Re-pricing of tapering and its impact will make case for lower rates for longer putting pressure on "real rates" down, which is main driver of gold. Long Gold via options. See 1575 by Q4 after our 1200 call in Outrageous Predictions was reached.

3.      We also like Corn unlike last year the crop estimates too high and agriculture is setting up nicely for bounce.

4.      Long MXN – Mexico remain the "best of the worst"stories in EMG – hit 13.50 now trading down to 13.10 – should we be right on Fed then this could trade significantly lower.

5.      Stocks. Been long risk deep into September now only long through options. The perfect set-up for us would be high in S&P around 1770/1800 before we fall back. The re-pricing could give new winds, but the calendar in Q4 is fully loaded with geo-political risks: German election, Italy w. Berlousconi, budget process, FOMC, Syria and generally September and October two months to avoid.

 

Below some supporting charts:

 

 

Fed overconfidence on growth:

 

'

 

The important Current Account trend:

 

 

Forward looking models indicate US growth will bottom in Q4-2014/Q1-2015

– followed by robust "real recovery"

 

Labor market could be turning up – recent data seems to confirm this…..

 

 

 

Our expected forward looking interest rate cycle… peak around now

…NEW LOW potential in 2014……

 

 

 

 

US Dollar move..

 

 

S&P 500 ……

 

 

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Economist

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

tirsdag den 17. september 2013

The end of the Euro as we know it - Panel

 

This is the panel debate at Friday's Saxo # Tradingdebates which I participated in:

 

http://video.saxobank.com/secret/8687264/68ddfa5deb3cfffec488146eeb7c6cdd

 

My CEO's Lars Seier Christensen's & President Klaus' keynote speeches:

 

http://video.saxobank.com/secret/8687201/d278241318ef7432480ea050dd905f4b

 

http://www.tradingfloor.com/topics/tradingdebates

 

 

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Economist

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

tirsdag den 10. september 2013

Macro Digest: Market is ripe for risk, surprisingly (Stress Indicators)

Dear All,

 

This weeks look at Stress Indicators is now online  (Please if possible you link as its gives you better charts….plus PDF attachment with all the indicators for your "consumption".

 

http://www.tradingfloor.com/posts/market-ripe-risk-surprisingly-1725178060

 

Upon running Saxo Bank's Stress Indicators this morning I was very surprised to see that most indicators are now very clearly in a risk-on mode. I would have expected the Syrian conflict, high oil prices, the Italian banking mess and the anticipation of upcoming tapering of asset purchases by the Federal Reserve to have done more damage to these indicators.

AUD versus JPY - ultimate risk indicator
AUD versus JPY is the 'ultimate risk indicator' because it is the one currency pair that captures: China (AUD), Asia (AUD, JPY), growth, carry trading and trade volumes. 

Fisher-Gartman risk index
Note that the Fisher-Gartman risk index is making new highs. This risk index is like many others predominantly designed to use daily data points which always means rate spread and VIX volatility. The conclusion which can be drawn from this index is clear, particularly on a day where US Congress votes on intervention in Syria and where we are one week away from one of the most defining moments in Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's reign (the Federal Open Market Committe meeting on September 17-18) and it's apparent that the market could not care less.

This leaves us with two interpretations:

  1. Our old mantra of the potential for year-highs here in September based on markets resetting the outlook for growth and hence the amount and timing of Fed tapering. (1770/1800 should be the 'ideal' target if this is for real.)
  2. Misalignment of perception and reality of the market. The one indicator which is 'off' in our sampling is real rates, which are setting new highs every day. Considering that the world, at least the financial world, has barely survived on zero interest rates since the Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008 (exactly five years ago this month), then this is deeply concerning.

Fed's bigger issue - lack of reaction to forward guidance
We have already seen the housing market cool, and certainly Friday's non-farm payrolls data was a major disappointment for the 'green shooters'. The Fed uses the wording "substantial improvement" of the economy (unemployment), but I do not think that even the Fed believes that lower unemployment rates via less participation constitutes real improvement.

See Mike Shedlock's piece: Just how distorted is the U.S Unemployment rate number?

The Fed's bigger issue though is its inability to get the market to react to its forward guidance, hence I expect vice Fed chair Janet Yellen to force through an extension of "low for even longer...", extending the zero-bound calendar for rates by one year to 2016 (Mid-2015 the consensus for now - Fed Chicago link). I also expect Fed staff to bring the Fed's growth forecast down from 2.45 percent for 2013, closer to Wall Street's consensus of 1.6 percent, combined with a worst very light touch of tapering (i.e: USD 10 billion - with USD 5 bln each in mortgages and Treasuries).

 10-year Treasury note yield index

Source: Saxo Bank and StockCharts.com

Fixed income market set on tapering
It is apparent that the fixed income market has already decided that the Fed will go ahead with a slow unwinding of asset purchases but also that the Fed's forward guidance should not be followed. This is evident because short-term rates have risen relatively more than long-term rates. We are testing a very long-term trend in the US 10-year yield.

I have taken a stance as per my video on being 80 percent in bonds, but it's a 12-month call based on considerable cooling of of the economy, as higher rates, lack of reforms, spending cuts, fiscal constraints, and less China growth will get both the US and Germany zero-bound in 2014.

Peak in September for green shoots
I remain probably alone in thinking that we are seeing a peak here in September for green shoots, the gap between perception and reality of Fed's action but also for flow out of fixed income. The big fixed income names have seen their AUM drop dramatically, but with 10 year rates @ 3.00% - I feel the "relative" value is in fixed income with the added bonus of having a "free put" on the stock market going into a September and October which generally tends to test our nerves:

See also Zerohedge: 1987, 2008 and 2013?


Finally, we have been constructive on the US dollar but feel it's time to change direction for a test of 78.00/79.00 in DXY - the US dollar index. The catalyst, if possible, could be the above-mentioned 'QE not tapering is coming' - or more directly, the emerging market crisis which has left USD-based EM countries in dire need of relief through a cheaper US dollar. World growth needs a weaker USD and it will probably come via the terms of trade. If not, the current account trend we have spoken so often about - Asia and EM from 5-7 percent CA surplus to zero-bound CA - will go negative before improving.

It's a hard call to make, especially against Europe and EURUSD. For now though, as the recent September BIS FX survey shows, 87 percent of all FX trades are based on the US dollar as being one of the currency pairs. Alas, the path of least resistance seems to be a weaker rather than stronger USD.

US dollar index - cash settle

Source: Saxo Bank and StockCharts.com

Safe travels into the September 17-18 FOMC meeting and the coming Syria conflict.

Steen Jakobsen

 

 

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Economist

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

mandag den 9. september 2013

Guest blog: Mike Shedlock - The Unemployment distortion...

My friend Mike shedlock done gr8 job here on the real state of uemployment..

 

 

http://advisorperspectives.com/dshort/guest/Shedlock-130909-Uemployment-Distortion.php

 

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Economist

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.