søndag den 28. september 2014

Steen's Chronicle: The Elephant in the room

 

Dear All,

 

The latest Steen's Chronicle – on the old chestnut of debt again and why a Minsky moment could be getting closer. Pretend-and-extend is still the playbook prefered as we will hear and see from ECB this week, but the return on debt financed assets is now close to returning marginal loss' due to compressed spreads, complacency and simple ignorance.

 

My main position remains the same: Major markets yields will go to new lows in Q2-2015 followed by big move in inflation and growth into 2016. For that to happen  a Minsky moment (or a war) needs to happen. Good luck this week.

London, 26 September, 2014

Debt - The Elephant in the Room

By Steen Jakobsen

'Interest on debt grows without rain' – Yiddish proverb

This proverb explains most of what goes on in policy circles these days. We are now watching Extend-and-Pretend, Episode VI: Promises for improvement amid ever growing debt levels.

Short put, we're still working with the same dog-eared script we were introduced to all of five years ago, when markets had stabilized in the wake of the financial crisis: maintain sufficiently low interest rates to service the debt burden. Pretend to have credible plan, but never address the structural problem and simply buy more time. But while we were able to get away with this theme for an awfully long time, the dynamic is now changing as the risk of low inflation (and even deflation) is a brick wall for the extend-and-pretend meme. Yes, interest does grow without rain, and the cost of maintaining and servicing debt grows especially fast in a deflationary regime.

Mads Koefoed, Saxo Bank's macro economist projects US growth at around 2.0% for all of 2014. That will be the sixth year with US growth near 2.0% - so despite lower unemployment, despite a record high S&P500, the economy has a hard time escaping that 2.0% level. Any talk of higher interest rates is hard to take seriously when US growth is going nowhere and world growth is considerable weaker than expected in January or as recently as July, for that matter. It seems everyone has forgotten that even the US is a part of the global economy.

The fourth quarter is always the most politically interesting time of year. Countries need to get their new budgets in order. The EU, IMF and World Bank will need to pretend they agree or accept the weaker data, which has to mean bigger deficits. It's a tiresome exercise to watch denial-in-action as EU governments and other policymakers try to make something so obviously unpalatable go down easy in their internal reporting. It's obvious that buying more time (extending) is always the number one priority, followed by projecting (pretending) the forward looking growth will reach an ever higher trajectory in order to make the budget fit within the supposed constraints. Or in France's case, the recent unilateral abandonment of meeting budget targets for the next two years is already a fait accompli.

Who's next?

Such behavior would cost you your job in the private sector, but in the economic model of 2014, which reminds us more of Soviet Union than a market based economy, its par for the course. But, many would protest, it would be even worse if we hadn't done so much to "save the system", right?

Well maybe, except for the fact that those economies where belief in State Capitalism is strongest:  Russia, China and France, are all at the end of the line. Time has caught up. Negative productivity, capital flight and a system built on protecting the elite is failing. France is now moving from recession to depression. China is moving quickly from denial towards a mandate for change, Russia's future has not looked this bleak since the late 1990's.  Meanwhile the US continues on sluggish 2.0% growth. Investors and pundits seem to have forgotten that we were promised 2014 would be the end of the crisis. Instead, we are speeding towards the inflection point at which debt becomes harder to service because pretend-and-extend policy making have created a depression in investment and consumption.

The public debt loads continue to inflate across Europe: Portugal's public debt has ramped to a staggering 130% of GDP – up from about 70% in 2007. Greece's public debt load, even after the restructuring of Greek debt a few years ago, has swelled to 175% of GDP. The EU now has far more systemic risk than at the beginning of the crisis. With zero growth or as our economist Mads sees it, 0.6% with the arrow pointing down, debt levels continue to rise relative to GDP. And most importantly, the current flirt with deflation will make servicing the growing debt even more expensive. The nightmare for ECB and world is deflation as it's a tax on debtors and a boon to net savers. The new reality is that we currently stand face-to-face with the very deflation risk that just about everyone denied could ever happen when Q1 outlooks were written.

Two other global threats, or time bombs, if you will, outside of the EU are risks from the growing costs of servicing debt in China and the USA. In China, the governments national and local have piled up considerable debt, but it is the overall debt service costs in all of China that are the real concern, which have only grown so large with the dangerous assumption by  Chinese banks, companies and citizens that they can count on a public bailout. According to a Societe Generale analyst, total debt service costs (including maturing debt and roll overs) in China area at nearly 39% of GDP.  Compare that with the closer to 25% of GDP for the USA in 2007.

In the US, interest on US government debt cost over 6% of budget outlays in 2013. This is relatively down from its worst levels when interest rates were much higher, but only because FOMC has so drastically lowered the costs for the US government to issue debt with a zero interest rate policy. And now the debt load is vastly larger than it was before the financial crisis – at 80% of GDP (net debt according to IMF) versus 45% of GDP a mere 10 years ago. So are we actually to believe that the Fed can lift the entire front-end of the curve from 0-1% (current rates out to three years) to 2-4% over the next two years without massive further stress on the deficit and only adding to the debt? Servicing 2% interest when growth is 2% means you are doing worse than standing in place if you also have a budget deficit.

Whatever the timing, the USA, China and Europe are all headed for another Minsky moment: the point in debt inflation where the cash generated by assets is insufficient to service the debt taken on to acquire the asset. The US productivity growth last year was +0.36%. The real growth per capita was about 1.5%. Anything which is not productivity is consumption of capital. So, the only way to grow an economy without productivity growth is temporarily with the use of debt – about 75% debt and 25% productivity growth in this case.

Since the 1970s, US productivity growth rates have fallen 81% - the move onto the internet has ironically made us bigger consumers and less productive. Had we remained at pre-1970s productivity, the US GDP would have been 55% higher and the outstanding debt to GDP would be easily fundable.

I just returned from Singapore on business – Singapore, to me, used to be the most rational business model around. Its founder Lee Kuan Yew was one of the greatest statesmen in history. Now, productivity is collapsing in Singapore. They are, like us, becoming the Monaco of the world, an economy based on consumption and not on productivity and growth. The developed economies are growing old in demographic terms, but we're still not wise enough to realize that our current model is a Ponzi scheme rushing toward its inevitable Minsky moment. No serious policymaker or central banker is talking about the truth told by simple maths and hoping that things turn out well. Hope is not good policy and it belongs in church, not in the real economy.

This paper was prepared for Saxo Capital Market's Media Round Table in London on Friday, 26 September, 2012.

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Investment Officer

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Research: http://www.tradingfloor.com/traders/steen-jakobsen

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

torsdag den 18. september 2014

Scotland says NO, but what does it mean for markets and politics

Most polls and early results have No vote winning a by nice margin 54-57 in most exit polls and polls…

 

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/live-scotland-referendum-poll-results-4284826

 

The NET market reaction is that GBP is higher, based on the fact that the NO vote clears the way for Bank of England to continue the hike path

 

GBPUSD and both EURGBP should go higher on the final result but the GBP move is slightly overdone in technical sense. Buy the rumor sells the facts will play out soon.

 

We have Quebec like situation in Scotland now – The independence talk is gone for now but the next item on the agenda politically is UK referendum next year where the independence and anti-EU vote will continue to play a role. 2017 is the big year, if the promised EU votes takes place……

 

EU did not do themselves any favors by ruling Scotland out of EU even before the election results was known. Scots, like danes, don't take outside pressure easy especially from something like the EU.

 

The main take away from macro perspective is the move towards very nationalistic and domestic driven political agendas. The EU and global agendas now plays 3rd violin as lack of growth and reforms become real issue.

 

The real economy is at least politically catching up to the artificial markets, so while the markets celebrate RISK ON again this morning, the politicians around Europe is taking notes: Change or lose your job! Just ask the Labor party in the UK who almost lost their ability to get back into government as 30 MP's would have been lost overnight with a Yes.

 

Steen Jakobsen

 

 

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

onsdag den 17. september 2014

FFOMC: The inconvenient fact: Yellen & Dudley still in control. Doves 1: Hawks 0

 

Dear All,

 

A quick note before I am off to Asia. Steen

 

 

FOMC: Keeps "considerable time" but brings out "exit plan paper" - net result: Yellen is more in control of FOMC than market gives her credit for and regional Presidents has less.

 

Market initial reaction is to extend last few weeks trade of stronger US Dollar and higher yield but considering that NET the statement did not move the needle and FOMC remains very cautious I expect these trends to reverse when the "final analysis" comes in.

 

Fed statement tracker - WSJ:    http://projects.wsj.com/fed-statement-tracker/#

 

 

 

I still see this as peak of US dollar strength cycle - the biggest take away for me is that Yellen kept control .

 

She was more dovish in Q & A than statement hence the "counter-balance" is from regional banks Presidents but Yellen, Dudley and Fischer still controls the game plan. 

 

Data dependency remains but even lower unemployment numbers will not move sentiment and needle w. FOMC management - 

 

However today's CPI is of concern. Deflation is coming to the US. This of course is denied by hawkish camp - by the way the same names which said Europe was in no danger less than six month ago -

 

The world is still in process of dealing with credit debt mountains, end of monetary cycle, a China which can't get engine restarted and a Europe where the second biggest economy no longer is in recession but depression. Furthermore Scotland and election is showing a clear trend towards domestic/local focus over international/free trade. In other words: Anti-globalisation is the new trend and the biggest losers over time may be that US of A we all respect and love.

 

TRADE:

 

Buy EURUSD spot here 1.2875 w. firm stop loss @ 1.2810 offered.

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

tirsdag den 16. september 2014

Hilsenrath: The case for the Fed to tweak but keep "considerable time" for now..

WSJ Analysis: The Case for the Fed to Tweak but Keep "Considerable Time" For Now

In a webcast Tuesday, I explained why I thought the Federal Reserve would stick with, but qualify, an important phrase in its policy statement Wednesday which assures near-zero interest rates for a "considerable time." This was simply my best analysis of where I think the Fed is going based on what we have been reporting and what officials have said in the past.

Here is what we know and have reported:

• A growing number of Fed officials want to alter an assurance that they expect to keep short-term rates near zero for a "considerable time" after a bond-purchase program ends in October. They want to be seen as making their decisions based on the economy's performance and not the calendar. "Considerable time" appears to bind them to the calendar. Moreover, with the bond program ending next month, they can no longer attach "considerable time" to the program, added impetus to rethink the guidance. That's why, as we've reported, this phrasing is going to get significant discussion at this week's policy meeting.

• There didn't appear to be a consensus before the meeting about when to change this language. As we reported, in an interview with the Wall Street Journal, Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren suggested he thought October would be an appropriate time to shift the language. "Presumably if the economy unfolds as we expect, we still stop the bond-purchase program in October," he said. "That will give us an opportunity to rethink how the statement should read. At that point I think we should be emphasizing less forward guidance and more focus on how the incoming data is coming in." Dennis Lockhart, president of the Atlanta Fed, told my colleague Pedro Nicolaci da Costa in Jackson Hole, Wyo., "I don't think we need to be too fast to change that guidance."

• The Fed wants to be data dependent. The economic data since its last policy meeting show the pace of improvement in the labor market has slowed and inflation remains below its 2% objective. The jobless rate, for instance, was 6.1% in August and 6.1% in June, which was the recording they had in hand when they last met in July. Spending and investment data suggest the Fed's forecast of a growth rate near 3% in the second half of the year is on track. Against a similar backdrop in July the Fed judged there was significant slack in the economy and that rates would stay low for a considerable time after the bond program ended.

• Since June Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen has been qualifying her assessment of considerable time to warn the public that rate increases could come sooner than planned if the labor market and inflation improved more quickly than expected, as they did in the first half of the year. Here is what she said in Jackson Hole last month. It is a mouthful, but fully describes her thinking as of late August:

"At the FOMC's most recent meeting, the Committee judged, based on a range of labor market indicators, that "labor market conditions improved." Indeed, as I noted earlier, they have improved more rapidly than the Committee had anticipated. Nevertheless, the Committee judged that underutilization of labor resources still remains significant. Given this assessment and the Committee's expectation that inflation will gradually move up toward its longer-run objective, the Committee reaffirmed its view "that it likely will be appropriate to maintain the current target range for the federal funds rate for a considerable time after our current asset purchase program ends, especially if projected inflation continues to run below the Committee's 2 percent longer-run goal, and provided that longer-term inflation expectations remain well anchored." But if progress in the labor market continues to be more rapid than anticipated by the Committee or if inflation moves up more rapidly than anticipated, resulting in faster convergence toward our dual objectives, then increases in the federal funds rate target could come sooner than the Committee currently expects and could be more rapid thereafter. Of course, if economic performance turns out to be disappointing and progress toward our goals proceeds more slowly than we expect, then the future path of interest rates likely would be more accommodative than we currently anticipate."

• The Fed has other business on its plate Tuesday and Wednesday. Officials are trying to finalize an "exit plan" that would establish the mechanics for how the central bank will manage interest rate increases when the time comes. (Important components of the exit plan were laid out in minutes from their last meeting.) They are also preparing to end their bond-buying program in October.

Here's my analysis: Janet Yellen is a methodical individual and the Fed, in normal times, is a slow-moving institution. It takes time for debates to play out. Ms. Yellen is seeking consensus, as we reported earlier this week. The considerable time debate doesn't feel ripened or fully aired. When Ms. Yellen has used the phrase in recent months she has qualified it, but not suggested changing it. Meantime the Fed has other business on its plate. The exit plan has been in the works for months, as has the plan to end bond buying. Changing the "considerable time" guidance now, while also announcing an exit plan, could be viewed by market participants as a surprising move toward raising rates.

Fed officials haven't forgotten last year's "taper tantrum," when long-term interest rates shot up as they commenced discussions about winding down the bond program.

We reported earlier this week that Ms. Yellen, as Fed chairwoman, hasn't behaved as the easy-money policy "dove" that many market participants expected. That doesn't mean she's suddenly a hawk. It just means she's not a dove.

Ms. Yellen's most logical next step, to my mind, would be to stick for the time being to what she's been saying, which is that rates will stay low for a "considerable time" with the strong qualification that this could change if the job market keeps improving quickly. Staying on message this month could entail signaling an end to the bond program and a more formal exit strategy. The Fed would then have time to air out a change in the "considerable time" formulation for a later date, giving Ms. Yellen time to get all of her colleagues on board.

Will the Fed take these steps? Only the people in the room know that. The rest of us will see Wednesday afternoon.

 

Related coverage:

What to Expect From the Federal Reserve Decision: WSJ's Hilsenrath and Reddy Discuss

Hilsenrath: How the Federal Reserve Could Tweak 'Considerable Time'

5 Things to Watch at This Week's Fed Meeting

Fed Chief Yellen Seeks Interest-Rate Consensus

How Does Janet Yellen Spend Her Time? Check Her Calendar

The Outlook: Fed Sizes Up Alternate Rate-Hike Paths

Fedspeak Cheatsheet: What Are Fed Policy Makers Saying?

 

 

 

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Investment Officer

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Research: http://www.tradingfloor.com/traders/steen-jakobsen

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

onsdag den 10. september 2014

Macro Digest: Monetary policy is being tested and FED grows tough on bank capital requirement.....

This is key news but also a consequence of poor policy - the goal is obsolete.....but....

This is trend now:

BOE does not what to say or do as their stated goal fulfilled but real wages continues to tank...
ECB has said they have reached zero, i.e: limited down side in long end Europe yield - Spread US vs. EU 10 yr proves the point - inflation exp. Ridiculously high...but that's the market for you...
FED like BOE needs new "agenda" - do also not underestimate the "MARGIN CALL" Fed is doing on its bank .... This link is AN ABSOLUTE MUST KNOW/READ:

http://www.marketpulse.com/20140910/wall-st-banks-feel-pressure-feds-new-rule/

This could be "TAPERING, version 2.0" for bond market.

OUTLOOK:

I am square in bonds outright - own spread long 10 YR US vs. 10 YR Bunds...... Believe there is correction of yield up - but - still see new lows in Q1/Q2 after correction.....

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Fed Weighs Change to Rate Guidance in Quest for More Flexibility
2014-09-10 09:00:00.3 GMT


By Jeff Kearns, Christopher Condon and Steve Matthews
Sept. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve officials are considering whether to alter their guidance on the likely path of interest rates to give them more flexibility to react to changes in the economy.
The Fed has said since March that its benchmark rate would stay low for a "considerable time" after it completes monthly bond buying intended to boost growth. With purchases set to end late this year and the Fed nearing its full-employment goal, that assurance will soon become obsolete.
The need for new guidance unites policy makers who want to keep rates low for longer, like Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren, with those who prefer to raise them sooner, such as Philadelphia's Charles Plosser. Both want to move away from promising to keep rates low for some unspecified period of time toward tying the first increase to changes in inflation and the job market. One stumbling block: how to change the language without sparking an unwanted jump in bond yields that could threaten to stifle the expansion.
"That's going to be hotly debated," said Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in New York and a former Fed Board researcher. "If they can find a way to replace that with something that will mollify the market's reaction, you will see a change."
Tightening isn't imminent. In June, policy makers forecast that the benchmark federal funds rate would rise some time next year. They will issue new forecasts for the rate, along with economic growth, unemployment and inflation, at the conclusion of a Sept. 16-17 meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee.

Twin Goals

Policy makers say they want to move away from any form of guidance based on time periods and dates, and instead stress that the outlook for the federal funds rate depends on progress toward the Fed's twin goals of full employment and low and stable inflation.
"As we approach levels of unemployment that many consider 'full employment,' the Fed should no longer issue guidance on the approximate timing of any monetary policy changes,"
Rosengren, who has backed unprecedented stimulus and doesn't have a vote on policy this year, said in a Sept. 5 speech in Boston.
Rosengren said the Fed should be "patient" in conducting policy "in the interest of ensuring that the economy reaches full employment and the 2 percent inflation target as quickly as possible."
Unemployment fell to 6.1 percent last month from 10 percent in October 2009. The decline has been faster than Fed officials expected at the end of last year, when they forecast that the jobless rate would fall to 6.3 percent to 6.6 percent by the end of 2014.

'Significant Progress'

Plosser dissented at the Fed's June meeting because the guidance didn't reflect "significant progress" toward the central bank's goals. Plosser, in a Sept. 6 speech in Florida, said that the "considerable time" language is "no longer appropriate or warranted."
Plosser said he sees no need to replace the phrase with any new language, because the Fed's statement already links policy with progress toward its goals.
"I'm not sure there needs to be anything to replace it,"
Plosser told reporters after his Sept. 6 speech. "My preference would be to just stop there."
Yet economists said Fed officials must tread carefully to avoid a repeat of last year's surge in borrowing costs that followed signals they might slow bond buying sooner than expected, an event some dubbed the "taper tantrum."

Changing Intentions

"Once you're saying something, the mere the fact you stop saying it is taken as a decision, as a definite indication that something has changed in your intentions," said Michael Woodford, a professor of economics at Columbia University in New York.
"I don't think anyone thinks if you just take it away no one will notice," said Woodford, who presented a paper at the central bank's annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, in
2012 that emphasized the importance of forward guidance with interest rates almost at zero.
Fed officials, including Chair Janet Yellen, have fretted that low-rate assurances have lulled investors into a false sense of complacency, suppressing volatility in stock, bond and currency markets.
A disconnect between market expectations for interest rates and the Fed's own forecasts shows "the public might not give enough weight to how dependent the central bank's guidance is on both current and incoming data," researchers at the San Francisco Fed wrote in a report released this week.
U.S. stocks declined yesterday as the report fueled concern the Fed might tighten sooner than anticipated. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index lost 0.7 percent to 1,988.44 at the close of trading in New York.

Rate Forecasts

Fed officials in June forecast the federal funds rate will rise to 1.13 percent by the end of next year and to 2.5 percent a year later. Investors in federal funds rate futures foresee a slower increase, to 0.76 percent by the end of 2015 and 1.78 percent in December 2016.
The central bank's forward guidance evolved after it cut the federal funds rate almost to zero in December 2008, where it has remained. With no room to cut further, the Fed sought ways to assure markets borrowing costs would stay low to help the economy recover from the worst recession since the Great Depression.
They did that initially by saying that the funds rate, the interest banks charge each other for overnight loans, would stay "exceptionally low" for "some time," or for "an extended period." That was later changed to guidance based on a specific date.

Calendar Guidance

In December 2012, the Fed dropped its calendar guidance, and instead said it would keep rates low as long as the jobless rate is above 6.5 percent and the outlook for inflation is no higher than 2.5 percent.
In March, the Fed dropped the link between policy and a specific level of unemployment, and adopted the "considerable time" language for the main rate.
To reassure investors, the Fed said also that dropping the unemployment threshold didn't indicate "any change in the committee's policy intentions as set forth in its recent statements."
Feroli said the Fed could adopt a similar assurance should it choose to move away from its "considerable time" pledge.
Even so, dropping the phrase "could get misconstrued" as signaling a policy change, he said. "This time around it will be a little trickier."

For Related News and Information:
Yellen's Dials Defy Truman's Plea for a One-Handed Economist NSN NBN1BI6TTDTF<GO> Fed Officials Said Job Gains May Bring Faster Interest-Rate Rise NSN NAMA006TTDSM<GO> Rosengren Says Fed Should Revert to More Specific Rate Guidance NSN N43B3X6JIJV6<GO> Janet Yellen's Labor Market Dashboard: http://bloom.bg/1dRaQ5y Fed Board Labor Market Conditions Index:LMCILMCC Index GP <GO> Kansas City Fed Labor Market Indicators:ALLX KCMT <GO> Pace of monthly Fed asset purchases: TREFAMSP Index GP <GO> Economic Statistics: ECST <GO> Economic Workbench: ECWB <GO> Economics Surprise Monitor: ECSU <GO> Fed Twitter feed on Bloomberg: NH TWT_FEDERALRESERVE <GO>

To contact the reporters on this story:
Jeff Kearns in Washington at +1-202-624-1806 or jkearns3@bloomberg.net; Christopher Condon in Washington at +1-202-654-4333 or ccondon4@bloomberg.net; Steve Matthews in Atlanta at +1-404-507-1310 or smatthews@bloomberg.net To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Chris Wellisz at +1-202-624-1862 or
cwellisz@bloomberg.net
Gail DeGeorge
This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

tirsdag den 9. september 2014

Charts: World growth / Copper / EURUSD

Small selection of charts I am preparing  / using in my next Steen's Chronicle & presentations…..

 

Core views:

 

US bonds will outperform Europe =è Rising EURUSD…

Yield and growth will reach low in Q1/Q2 2015

 

 

 

World growth w. copper leading three months = 1-1.5%?

 

 

Ratio of 10 Y Germany yield / 10 Yr US rates rebased to Index 100 benchmark.. Ie: Since ECB bunds TRAILING ….

 

 

Copper breaking down – also testing weekly and monthly: Hat-tip Matt.

 

 

 

My old simple chart: observe correlations btw. Growth trend & copper trend

 

 

 

Jobless claims as fraction of labor force – not all good news? St Lois source… Note the coindicidents of 20% reached in 2000, 2007 and 2014….?

Bunds tested support later today… for now its "safe"…

 

 

US yields still the most attractive in G-7… observe "mean-reversion"?

 

 

Is this why we should contemplate ECB actions as being bullish for inflation and hence EURUSD?

 

 

Asian growth continues to underperform…and to my surprise its now 40% of global GDP…

 

 

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Investment Officer

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Research: http://www.tradingfloor.com/traders/steen-jakobsen

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

Macro Digest: Wrong? US Dollar update....

"Hard to say what's right when all I wanna do is wrong." 
― Prince

US Dollar view update: The negative US dollar which is really a call for US rates to fall more than German - not outright short US Dollar is out of the money by 2% BUT.... the trade is working in Fixed Income as Germany yield is now moving relatively higher than US - if this continues we should see impact on US dollar as well.... 

- ECB is a zero now - Long end should sell off as inflation expectations rise... See chart below....
- Germany Budget today sounds hawkish on "Germanic approach" to growth and budgets... balanced budget...
- Still awaiting news on Draghi future... follow Italians news.

For now I am with Prince - however note how US yield is coming down faster...(rising slower....)

 

10 Yr. US minus 10 Yr. Germany Index to 100 on day of US Dollar short call….


 

 

10 Yr. US / 10 Yr. Germany Index to 100 on day of US Dollar short call….

 

 

 

EURO inflation Swap 10 YR vs. EURUSD….. will it be inflation expectations which drives EURO from low?

 

 



US 10 Yr still most "expensive or highest yielding" vs. G-7 yield structure – chase for yield?

 

 

Steen

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Investment Officer

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Research: http://www.tradingfloor.com/traders/steen-jakobsen

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.

torsdag den 4. september 2014

Macro Digest: Is Draghi heading back to Italy?

ECB: I will let other discuss the mechanics of Draghi's speech but I want to elaborate on what I think is / could be happening behind the headlines in ECB and with Draghi.

The last few days I have heard more and more rumors that Draghi could on his way home to Italy as President back stopping Renzi's reform program. Of course, at first I refused, but let's go through the rationale here:

1.) Draghi and the ECB at the end of their cycle.

 

Even Draghi acknowledged today that ECB is now at zero - Not heading to zero bound. In other words ECB now needs the politicians to step and force reforms which make banks lend and consumers consume. The ECB have reached zero not only in interest rates, but also in ability to do more - An ECB with Weidmann could mean 1.2900/1.3000 becomes the low.

 

Furthermore if this is truly the end of ECB and Draghi in terms of "doing something" – then the real question is…….Where does Bunds go? Up or down?  Down – most likely it will be a focus on reforms and being productive over investment in money.

My weaker US Dollar call is slightly artificial as what I am REALLY saying is: US Yield will fall more than German (European rates) from here… US 10 Y vs. G7 is at mean-reversion high of 80 BPS!!!  It's more a fixed income call AND I my biggest 2014 bet remains the same: New ALL TIME low in yields is coming – and the low will be Q1/Q2 in 2015. The short US Dollar Index positions is out of the money by 1%  and of course I need stop loss, but I am long term.



2.) Who is better to fight the political pretend-and-extend modus operandi in European capitals - Draghi or Weidmann? Who has Germany's full support?

 

We are deep into 9th inning on monetary policy responses  - IF – and it's a big if, the above is going to happen, this could be the big MANDATE-FOR-CHANGE just about every single piece from me have talked about in the last two years. Changes happens when there are no alternatives – I don't see how ECB can do more from here……

 

My italian colleague Gian Paolo Bazzani, CEO of  Saxo Italy, makes an excellent case: "Since 2012 and up to Napolitano re-election we have had rumors about this role for Super Mario. The most recent hypothesis is that Napolitano could resign after reforms (which ones???) and Draghi already talks as a politician:  "It 's time to give up sovereignty over the reforms. Italy rejects investments" (August 7th)

 

As a bare minium – "insure" your short EURUSD with some EUR calls – a one month 1.3205 is only 25 ticks.

 

Steen

 

Med venlig hilsen  |  Best regards
Steen Jakobsen  |  Chief Investment Officer

 

Saxo Bank A/S  |  Philip Heymans Allé 15  |  DK-2900 Hellerup
Phone: +45 39 77 40 00  |  Direct: +45 39 77 62 23  |  Mobile: +45 51 54 50 00

 

Research: http://www.tradingfloor.com/traders/steen-jakobsen

Please visit our website at www.saxobank.com

 

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this email
by mistake), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
email. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this email is strictly prohibited.

Email transmission security and error-free status cannot be guaranteed
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, destroyed, delayed,
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which may arise as a result of email transmission.